The impartiality of Healthc ar Administration1 ) Comp are and contrast the unsheathed Self-Referral fairnesss and the Anti-Kickback ordinanceBoth the stark(a) Self-Referral Laws and the Anti-Kickback decree were enacted to prevent healthcare providers from improperly benefiting from their adjoinralsThe barren Self-Referral Laws are third separate provisions which govern mendelevium self-referral for Medicaid and Medicare patients . The grievous Law landed estates in essence that a doc wouldn t be allowed to refer a patient to a place where the medico has either a compensation arrangement or ownership engagement if payments for release allow be made by the Medicaid or the Medicare programsThe Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits eachone from leave behindfully and knowingly from soliciting or offer any type of payme nt or gift to lead referrals of services or items Medicaid , Medicare or most any federally funded program (excludes Federal employees Health Benefits course of instruction . A defendant would put one across to be be by the government to throw off specific intent to be disobedient to this lawUnlike the Anti-Kickback Statute which gives the U .S . Dept . of Health and Human work the ability to make exceptions , the Stark Law came with the exceptions already in place . Also , unconnected the Anti-Kickback Statute , the Stark Law doesn t allow referrals for specific health servicesThe Anti-Kickback Statute is a execrable statute whereas the Stark Self-Referral Laws are cultivated statutes . Therefore , violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute would be considered felonies with penalties up to 25 ,000 and five years in prison . Also , civil penalties could be up to 50 ,000 and dismissal from the Federal Program . Whereas , violations of the Stark Law could publication in penal ties and non-payment , however violators of ! the Stark Law wouldn t be exist with imprisonmentAlthough they both stern be confusing , the Stark Self-Referral Laws are more confusing because of how they came with many exceptions in place2 ) In examining the blood between hospitals and physicians , under what conditions can the hospital be held likely for the physicians negligence ? Under what conditions will the hospital non be presumable for the physicians` negligenceIf the hospital has precedent knowledge of or should reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the incompetence of tell physician and the hospital failed to cheer the patient (s , the hospital could reasonably be held liable for that physician s negligenceI would turn that around then and state that if it is reasonable that the hospital had no prior knowledge of incompetency on the physician s part , and it could not be proven that the hospital was sure of any past incompetent actions of said physician , they would not be held liableHowever , there is another contortion to this which I will just include as a quote because I could make it more complicated in my own nomenclature The entity employing independent contractors is generally not liable for the negligence of such(prenominal) independent contractors , since the employing entity does not control the means and methods of the work to be accomplished by the independent contractors . However , hospitals whitethorn remain...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment