'Rhetorical analysis “The Hardest of the Hardcore”\r'

'It is believed that the unify States allocates approximately 316 meg dollars a year on these groups. Distant from securing companies, they to a fault provide security for the police, and government officials. Most of them atomic number 18 ex-special forces, and veterans. Some argon ex-cons. Some people relate to them as mercenaries, and some people call them builders. Others would take proscribed the armorial bearing as training other soldiers. They argon used all around the world, providing divergent work in swan of the United States armed forces.\r\nWhat is their aim? Student, Dylan Fujitani in his research policy argument, â€Å"The hardest of the hardcore” writes an name suggesting the removal of surreptitious contractors from the lay East. It suggests that there is a commonality misconception that people ar confused between the battle of noncombatant contractors, mercenaries, people in the force, and that civilian contractors should not adopt a milit ary role. He adopts a serious t wizard in order to overtake the attention of his sense of hearing.\r\nThere are a dowry of misconceptions to what some may believe the key objectives of the support staff/ individual(a) contractors/ mercenaries are in the Middle East, and Congress must swiftly act to take aim the playing field between US military personnel and private security contractors. Most of the source’s points in the stress seem relevant, and invariable with my past experiences in dealing with private contractors. I agree that there is a common misconception close the role of the private contractor/mercenary. Historically, the mercenary is a soldier for hire, however, the private contractor also has different dignitary support roles.\r\nFujitani successfully uses pathos in his essay to persuade his audience particularly when he suggests that the use of mercenaries circumvents public, and congressional scrutiny of some aspects of fight (Fujitani 374). The source ’s purpose here is move to persuade people, by giving an emotional woo that civilian contractors (who have questionable prior backgrounds) are armed, are given essentially given sanctioned immunity. Another example of Fujitani using pathos is when he said that placing more contractors in the theater of struggle is a good way to keep US troops numbers checkmate, but politically it’s more expensive.\r\nHere he is suggesting that the United States is act to mask the severity of war. Even though he provided examples from both sides of the case, he’s extremely inefficacious in this area because it seems he was not come to with presenting the counterargument fair-mindedly. Although the writer uses pathos in this particular divide part of his essay, close to of this paper is tidings heavy. These styles of coincidence help the writer convey to his audience a sense of importance by using the row that is quite familiar to the military.\r\nHe indeed uses talk ing to that was easy for military, and nonmilitary personnel to understand. The writer seems very prejudiced, however, uses citations to support his sight. I agree with the writer on the information that was presented, and how he was able to break down the concepts. I understand what he proposes when he references the role of civilian mercenaries. The writer was able to convince readers that his opinion was truly legit using ethos by referencing several produce articles from credible sources. The reference New York Times article also gives good examples to support his reasoning.\r\nIn bank line to what the writer believes, I believe that there is a position that supports the private contracting business overseas. The writer clearly overlooks some important points that should be remark on the contrary. In my experience, I believe civilian contractors provide essential support work to the United States military. It is imperative that the military should not waste worthy resourc es, and work force on support positions. To the contrary of what most people think, war is not always injure at people, capturing prisoners, and kicking down doors 24 hours a day. A lot of essential jobs are in support.\r\nThe use of private contractors help with convoys, logistics, and food services help free up essential manpower for the military to concentrate on high mission profile assignments. In conclusion, the writer’s essay was ineffective because I believe that his essay appeals to one type of audience. The writer seems to not have all knowledge of how wartime operations are drawn out and conducted. Although not perfect, I believe that the use of private contractors are essential and should not be wholly weeded out the process. On the contrary, he was effective because I think he used mostly give-and-take to appeal to his audience.\r\nHe references essentially six principles on why private contractors/mercenaries should be extremely downscaled. He starts off by reference in how mercenaries mantled the true cost of war. Here he explains how civilian contractors actually disguise the number of deployed troops. He goes on and references how civilian contractors have no loyalties, and ultimately resolvent only to their employers and not the military. He again uses logos by citing a report on how mercenaries depute in Saudi Arabia left their post indefinitely, because they were not comfortable.\r\nFujanti then moves to tie the two points together making a clear contrast on how the US military, and civilian mercenaries are accountable to the Geneva Convention. He describes how civilian mercenaries have no accountability to the truth to whereas the US military does. The mercenaries are considered â€Å"noncombatants” and therefore it is baffling for them to fall within the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The writer closes his argument by expressing how private contractors frequently hire employees with questionable backgrounds .\r\nHe appeals to his audience by citing an article from the New York Times how 1500 S. African mercenaries are now in the Iraqi area. He expresses that many of the people that are participating admitted to macrocosm former apartheid mercenaries. Fujanti is clearly frustrated knowing that these kinds of practices are frequently carried, nothings done about it, and moves to propose his resolution by conveying that the problems that were discussed earlier needs to be addressed by Congress swiftly, and immediately to treasure the legitimate uses of war from market forces, lawlessness, and the abuse of power.\r\n'