How far did the problems of his reign stem from Edward VI’s minority? Essay

It can be said that Ed ward VIs minority, like umpteen other boy offices caused most of the problems in his rule simply because it was other men ruling the nation to their preferences and non to the boorishs. However, Edwards minority was not entirely responsible for the problems of his reign, the financial situation, for instance, was contagious from enthalpy VIII.Edwards minority did bring problems to his reign. Although Edward was a minor, it can be said that he influenced his councillors with his views on religion as soundly as on politics. The minority, however, meant that the councillors appointed by Henry VIII would rule the country until Edward was of age. However, somersault manipulated the court and was named noble shielder. One person was ruling England, means that he was carrying out his own views on matters, thither was no consultation. Somerset, to a certain extent was more concerned with power than with the country.Somersets disastrous contradictory polic y can ultimately be infernal on Edwards minority. Somerset was at war with Scotland as well as France. He was unable to inexpugnable a marriage confederation with between Edward and Mary Queen of Scots, which later married the French Dauphin. With the war he besides drove England into further debt, thereforely Edwards minority meant that Somerset was causing more problems than he was solving.Northumberland was also concerned with power. When Edward was dying, the time had become a serious problem because Northumberland perkmed to be firmly in control, but Edwards death meant that he would lose power. In an enterprise to secure his site he married his eldest son, to Lady Jane colour in in 1553. Jane Grey was title Queen by Northumberland, whilst Mary proclaimed herself Queen. Northumberland had underestimated the amount of support for Mary in the country. This event would perhaps not have occurred if Edward had not been a minor at the time a smooth succession would have p robably taken place.Both churchman Protectors had different aims. Whereas Somerset was more concerned with foreign policy, Northumberland tried to secure the financial situation. They seldom took the Kings views into account, thus his minority every last(predicate)owed the Lord Protectors to do as they pleased in which faux pas the problems did result as a result of Edwards minority.Throughout the ages we see that boy Kings have been failures mainly because of their minority. An example of this is Edward V and his younger pal who were deposed by their uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester. We see that a minor King was weaker, less right and easier to control, thus many problems could arise as a result of the Kings minority to the extent of a deposition which occurred in 1483.However, there were problems that arose which did not stem from Edwards minority. The financial situation was inherited from Henry VIII he had left the country bankrupt. Even though Somerset may have driven Engl and into further debt, the problem was already insert, thus this problem did not stem from his minority because the problem was already present when he came to power.People did not revolt against Edward. The grievances made no notice of their lugubriousness with the King. The Western Uprising and Ketts Rebellion were caused by the unhappiness of the peasants because of religious as well as socio-economic factors. The Tudors were a popular monarchy, thus people would do little to cause the deposition of the King or even problems. All the problems we find in his reign did not all stem from Edward VIs minority.Whoever ruled England from 1547 to 1553 faced great problems of inflation, misfortunate harvests, and the sweating sickness that killed many thousands in 1551. It is evident that the Kings minority cannot be held responsible for such uncontrollable things as unhealthiness and harvests.Somerset fell from power in 1549, despite this Edward remained in power. This is operative it shows that in spite of Somersets failure to secure his position as Lord Protector as well as the foreign and financial policy, people were loyal to their King thus his minority did not always cause problems.An adult King would have prevented trouble create amongst his councillors. There would have been no rivalries everyplace power. Clear policies would have also been established, whereas the changes and compromises of Somerset and Northumberland could have only improved the government. However, Edwards minority caused struggles over power, policies to the convenience and view of each councillor, and changes to suit each Lord Protector at the time, his minority seldom provided England with anything positive.