Competition and Consumer act in Australia-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Critically analyse how the Australian Consumer Law affects developers selling land insofar as that law governs: A. Misrepresentation; and B. Unfair Contract Terms. Answer: Introduction Competition and Consumer Act, 2010[1] is the legislation in Australia, which offers protection to the consumers and also works towards promotion of competition in the nation. Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act contains the specific provisions for the protection of consumers in the nation and this Schedule is known as the Australian Consumer Law (ACL)[2]. The act came into force on 01st Jan, 2001 and replaced the erstwhile act of Trade Practices Act, 1974[3]. ACL is a comprehensive legislation which protects the consumers in various fields, one of which is the construction field, and applies upon the developers who sell the land to prospective buyers[4]. The discussion carried here analyzes the ACL regarding its applicability on the developers when the land is sold by them. The emphasis of this discussion is on misrepresentation and unfair contract terms so that the applicability of provisions of ACL in this regard can be evaluated and also to analyze the possible implications of breach of ACL through use of unfair contract terms and misrepresentation. Misrepresentation Misrepresentation takes place when an individual is induced to enter into a contract by making of a false statement. Under ACL, the misrepresentation can be applied through two prominent sections, i.e., through section 18, which relates to misleading or deceptive conduct[5], and section 29, which relates to misleading or false representation[6]. Section 18 of the ACL prohibits such conduct which can possible, or which in fact does, misleads or deceives the consumer into believing something which is not true. For developers, this is done when their conduct misleads or deceivers the prospective buyer in believing a particular thing to be true, so that they can enter in the selling agreement[7]. The conduct involved here is not only physical, but includes the one sent through letters, emails, advertisements, and negotiations. Misleading or deceptive conduct can relate to factually incorrect information, through which, a false impression is created; not disclosing material facts to the buyer, by concealing or leaving out the major information; not providing the client with updated information; knowingly not correcting up a misunderstanding; and even making false or inaccurate claims[8]. The provisions of this act are such that both the consumer and the developers are safeguarded and any unjust claim is not upheld. An example of this can be seen in the decision given by the court, which favored the investor when the unit off the plan was purchased by them owing to the ten year 7% rental guarantee offered by the international hotel chain through the brochure. However, this guarantee was held to be worthless as it was given by a 2 dollar company and so, the parent company was made liable and the decision was given in favor of the buyer[9]. Another prominent section which safeguards the buyers in the nation is found in section 29, through which, the developer is prohibited from misleading or false representation. So, a developer cannot make a wrong representation regarding the standard, warranty, quality or sponsorship of a land[10]. In this regard, an agency cannot make such an advertisement that it has made a sale of 2000 houses in a single year when their claims cannot be properly backed up. A misrepresentation can also be undertaken through testimonials. In case a developer on their social media page gets a review from a friend, which is not genuine, or pays someone to post a fake review online, would be misleading the consumer through wrong representation, which can induce the buyer into entering the contract. Another example of this can be seen in the advertisements which are given by the developers claiming to have the necessary accreditation, when in reality, such accreditations are pending. In such cases also, the provisions of ACL would be contravened[11]. Section 4 of the ACL also presents a duty on the developers to not make such representations regarding the future issues, for which they lack the proper grounds to make the representation[12]. Hence, the developers need to refrain from making future promises, predictions, and opinions, till the time they can reasonable back them. Awad v Twin Creeks Properties Pty Ltd[13] was a case where the developers were able to remove the burden of proving that there was a presence of reasonable grounds for representation for producing the evidence to show the reasonable grounds. This was due to the fact that they provided an experienced representatives oral examination which was deemed as sufficient. Though, it is still recommended to have documentary evidence regarding representations of future[14]. This case clearly highlights that ACL does not merely protect the buyers, but also safeguards the developers from unnecessary pressure. ACL puts an explicit restriction on making or imposing false representation in the matter of the land being sponsored or affiliated; the use, price, location or features of the land; the facilities being available on the land; and the nature of interest in land. One of the examples of this can be seen in a developer making a wrong claim that the land is not located in earthquake prone zone; when in reality, it has been placed in medium earthquake range zone. Such a lie would be deemed to be misrepresentation as the purpose here is to sell the land by making false representation to the buyer. One more example of this can be sited in the claim being made by the developer that the distance of the property from the main road was just 2 km; however, this distance was based on the crow flies distance and by taking the actually constructed road, and the property would be 4.5 km away. Such representations are deemed as misrepresentations and lead to the breach of section 29 of the ACL. It is crucial that the price of the land is not misrepresented as the ACC often receives a high number of complaints for the under-stating or over-stating of the prices of the property[15]. Unfair Contract Terms The standard form of consumer contracts is regulated under the ACL for unfair terms. A particular significance has been laid down under the ACL for the property developers where the contracts are majorly impacted. The off-the-plan sales can also be impacted in such cases where the developer discretion is provided. The unfair terms which are present in the standard form contract are void due to their unenforceability under ACL. The ACL related unfair terms provisions are applicable in cases of consumer contracts, standard form contracts and where an unfair term is covered in these. The consumer contracts include the sale or grant of the interest held in land by one person, to another, in part or in whole, for domestic, household or personal use. So, this definition goes beyond covering the sales, and also contains the privileges and the powers which the developer of a land has[16]. The contract drawn by the developer would be considered as unfair when it results in a substantial imbalance regarding the rights and obligations which the parties have; where there is an absence of protection of the developers legitimate interest in a significant manner; and where the same could prove to be disadvantageous for the purchaser owing to the reliance made by them on the developer[17]. In the contract of sale drawn by the developer, there are different clauses which are in favor of the developer and which provide them with the flexibility in matters of completion of a project. Though, for claiming a breach under the provisions of ACL, it is crucial to show that the imbalance was a major one. And in this regarding, the court takes into consideration the standard industry practices for completion times, warranties and even for the discretionary terms, for a major imbalance to be claimed[18]. In order to make a decision regarding the particular term being crucial for protection of the developers legitimate interest, there is often a need to provide the evidence by the developer for the market in which they operate, the economic factors which are imposed by the financiers and which require a level of flexibility by the developers, ad also providing the requisite evidence for the market in which the developers operate, along with the regulations imposed by the councils and the planning schemes. The developers are also required to ensure that the contracts contain the proper discretion which is required to deliver the end product to the consumer, instead of providing unwarranted autonomy, which is often considered as unfair under the provisions of ACL[19]. Apart from developer, there is a also a need to take into consideration such cases, where the purchaser can be put in a disadvantageous position, particularly in terms of transparency and the entirety of the contract. ACL clearly presents different issues which can be deemed as being unfair terms. Some of these include deliberately limiting or avoiding the contract performance; bringing changes in the terms of the contract; putting limits on the evidence which the purchaser can present or through which an evidentiary burden can be placed on the proceedings regarding the contract; bringing changes in the price paid upfront without giving the purchaser an opportunity to end the contract; bringing out changes in the interest of land or its characteristics through which the land can be granted or sold unilaterally; assigning the contract in a manner which proves to be disadvantageous for the purchaser, without their specific consent; determining if a contract has been breached or there i s a need to interpret the meaning of the contract unilaterally; where the vicarious liability of the developer, for their agent is limited; introducing limitations to the rights of the purchaser to initiate legal case against the developer; imposing penalties on the purchaser for terminating the contract; the actual contract termination; and the non-renewing or renewing of the contract[20]. The circumstances which were present at a particular point of time also need to be taken into account to consider if the particular term is unfair and has to be made unenforceable through the law. A particular term would not be considered as being unfair where the term defines the main matter of the contract and has been permitted expressly or has been required through the law of commonwealth, state or territory; in addition to this, contains and sets up the upfront price which is required to be paid under the drawn contract. In most of the sale contract cases, the effective provisions of severance are inserted by the developers. Through the insertion of such provisions, the entire contract is not voided when an unfair term is found and only such term is severed, so that the remaining contract can be continued. However, where the term is of such importance that it is a crucial element of the contract and the same cannot be served, in such cases, the entire contract becomes unenforcea ble[21]. Conclusion In the preceding parts, the analysis revealed that the ACL offers major protection to the buyers of property in Australia, particularly against the developers in the matter of misrepresentation and unfair contract terms. Further, the case highlighted under the misrepresentation clarified that the ACL is not biased towards the consumers only and also takes into consideration the interests of the developers. Further, it became clear that for misrepresentation cases, the protection under ACL is given through different sections which include false representation and misleading conduct. The discussion moved on to highlight the manner in which the unfair terms in a contract can make the contract voidable, in case the same cannot be severed. So, any term which unfairly puts the buyer in an unfair position can be severed and can also lead to the contract being made enforceable. In short, when a prospective buyer goes to purchase the land from a developer in the nation, their rights are adequ ately protected through the ACL and they cannot be deceived, mislead or falsely represented due to the applicability of different provisions of ACL. Bibliography Articles/ Books/ Reports Bailey J, Construction Law (CRC Press, 2014) Corones SG, The Australian Consumer Law (Lawbook Company, 2nd ed, 2012) Davie T, Earls T, and Coggins J, Understanding Construction Law (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2016) Stadler E, Consumer Law Unlocked (Siber Ink,2013) Thampapillai D, Tan V, and Bozzi C, Australian Commercial Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015) Cases Awad v Twin Creeks Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 200 Legislations Competition and Consumer Act, 2010 (Cth) Trade Practices Act, 1974 (Cth) Others Allens, Focus: Representations about Future Matters (11 July 2012) https://www.allens.com.au/pubs/realestate/fore11jul12.htm Department of Commerce WA, Australian Consumer Law (2013) https://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/atoms/files/aclagentsmanual2013_0.pdf Legal Vision, A Guide to Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and False Misrepresentation (14 April 2016) https://legalvision.com.au/a-basic-guide-to-misleading-and-deceptive-conduct-and-false-misrepresentations-australian-consumer-law/ Lethlean J, Daniels J, Deakin M, and Payne T, Australia: How the New Australian Consumer Law Will Affect Property Developers (11 May 2010) https://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/100132/How+The+New+Australian+Consumer+Law+Will+Affect+Property+Developers Competition and Consumer Act, 2010 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010, sch 2 Trade Practices Act, 1974 (Cth) Stephen G. Corones, The Australian Consumer Law (Lawbook Company, 2nd ed, 2012) Australian Consumer Law, s18 Australian Consumer Law, s29 Legal Vision, A Guide to Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and False Misrepresentation (14 April 2016) https://legalvision.com.au/a-basic-guide-to-misleading-and-deceptive-conduct-and-false-misrepresentations-australian-consumer-law/ Dilan Thampapillai, Vivi Tan and Claudio Bozzi, Australian Commercial Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015) Department of Commerce WA, Australian Consumer Law (2013) https://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/atoms/files/aclagentsmanual2013_0.pdf Elizabeth de Stadler, Consumer Law Unlocked (Siber Ink,2013)At 5 Australian Consumer Law, s4 [2012] NSWCA 200 Allens, Focus: Representations About Future Matters (11 July 2012) https://www.allens.com.au/pubs/realestate/fore11jul12.htm Justin Lethlean, Joanne Daniels, Murray Deakin and Travis Payne, Australia: How The New Australian Consumer Law Will Affect Property Developers (11 May 2010) https://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/100132/How+The+New+Australian+Consumer+Law+Will+Affect+Property+Developers Julian Bailey, Construction Law (CRC Press, 2014) Tom Davie, Tony Earls and Jeremy Coggins, Understanding Construction Law (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2016) At 16 Ibid Ibid